{"id":19,"date":"2012-04-20T08:40:20","date_gmt":"2012-04-20T08:40:20","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/wp10997512.wp284.webpack.hosteurope.de\/?page_id=19"},"modified":"2026-03-04T22:23:30","modified_gmt":"2026-03-04T22:23:30","slug":"publications","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"http:\/\/www.lumer.info\/?page_id=19","title":{"rendered":"Publications"},"content":{"rendered":"

Publications and Works by Christoph Lumer<\/h1>\n

(Last update: 4.3.2026)<\/p>\n

Download List of Publications as pdf: Lumer_Publications_200707.pdf<\/a>.<\/p>\n

I. (Monographic) Books<\/strong><\/h2>\n

B1<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: Practical Theory of Argumentation. Theoretical Foundations, Practical Justification and Rules of Some Important Types of Arguments. („Praktische Argumentationstheorie. Theoretische Grundlagen, praktische Begr\u00fcndung und Regeln wichtiger Argumentations-arten“, in German). Braunschweig: Vieweg 1990. XI, 474 pp.<\/p>\n

B2<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: Rational Altruism. A Prudential Theory of Rationality and Altruism. („Rationaler Altru-ismus. Eine prudentielle Theorie der Rationalit\u00e4t und des Altruismus“, in German.)
\n1. 1st ed.:<\/em> Osnabr\u00fcck: Universit\u00e4tsverlag Rasch 2000. 652 pp.
\n2.<\/em> 2nd, supplemented ed. Paderborn: mentis 2<\/span><\/span>2009. 675 pp.<\/p>\n

B3<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: The Greenhouse. A Welfare Assessment and Some Morals. Lanham, Md.; New York; Oxford: University Press of America 2002. ix; 117 pp.<\/p>\n

B4<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: Cognitive Philosophy of Action. Empirical Laws of Action, Freedom and the Founda- tions of Practical Rationality. („Kognitive Handlungstheorie. Empirische Handlungsge-setze, Freiheit und die Grundlagen praktischer Rationalit\u00e4t“, in German). (In preparation.)<\/p>\n

II.\u00a0Editions<\/strong><\/p>\n

E1<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph; Sandro Nannini (Eds.): Intentionality, Deliberation and Autonomy – The Action-Theoretic Basis of Practical Philosophy. Aldershot: Ashgate 2007; 2nd<\/sup> ed., paperback: Abingdon, Oxon; New York: Routledge 2<\/sup>2016. xiii; 311 pp. – Contributions by: Frederick Adams & Annie Steadman, Robert Audi, Michael Bratman, Carl Ginet, Geert Keil, Christoph Lumer, Hugh McCann, Alfred Mele, Carlos Moya, Sandro Nannini, Michael Quante, Neil Roughley, Gottfried Seebass, Thomas Spitzley, Ralf Stoecker.<\/p>\n

E2<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph (Ed.): The Epistemological Approach to Argumentation. = Two special issues of: Informal Logic 25,3 (2005), pp. 189-287; 26,1 (2006), pp. 1-120. – Contributions by: Mark Battersby, John Biro & Harvey Siegel, Richard Feldman, James B. Freeman, Ulrike Hahn & Mike Oaksford, Michael Hoffmann, Brian Huss, Christoph Lumer, Mark Weinstein, Michael Weinstock.<\/p>\n

E3<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph (Ed.): Normative Ethics – Principles of Acting Morally. („Etica normativa – principi dell’agire morale“, in Italian.) Roma: Carocci 2008. 191 pp. – With contributions by: Francesco Allegri, Luisella Battaglia, Sergio Cremaschi, Vanna Gessa-Kurotschka, Christoph Lumer. Sebastiano Maffettone, Maria Moneti, Furio Semerari, Stefano Semplici, Isabel Trujillo P\u00e9rez.<\/p>\n

E4<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph (Ed.): Rational Choice and Ethics. = Special issue of: Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 13,5 (2010). Pp. 483-593. – With contributions by: Sven Ove Hansson, Christoph Lumer, Edward McClennen, Jan Narveson, Bruno Verbeek.<\/p>\n

E5<\/em>\u2014Fehige, Christoph; Christoph Lumer; Ulla Wessels (Eds): Meaningful and Violent Actions. Philo-sophical Essays for Georg Meggle. („Handeln mit Bedeutung und Handeln mit Gewalt. Philosophische Aufs\u00e4tze f\u00fcr Georg Meggle“, the contributions are in German or English.) Paderborn: mentis 2009. 478 pp. – With contributions by: Christoph Fehige, G\u00fcnther Grewendorf, Ted Honderich, Beatrice Kobow, Nikola Kompa, Weyma L\u00fcbbe, Christoph Lumer, Georg Meggle, Daniel Messelken, Igor Primoratz, Julian Nida-R\u00fcmelin, Richard Raatzsch, Peter Rohs, Oliver R. Scholz, Rudolf Sch\u00fcssler, Peter Singer, Wolfgang Spohn, Pirmin Stekeler-Weithofer, Raimo Tuomela, Ulla Wessels, V\u00e9ronique Zanetti.<\/p>\n

E6<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph; Uwe Meyer (Eds.): Mind and Morals. Analytical Reflections for Wolfgang Lenzen. (\u201cGeist und Moral. Analytische Reflexionen f\u00fcr Wolfgang Lenzen\u201c, most contributions are in German, some are in English.) Paderborn: mentis 2011. 310 pp. – With contributions by: Ansgar Beckermann, Dieter Birnbacher, Antonella Corradini, Christoph Fehige, Andreas Kamlah, Franz von Kutschera, Christoph Lumer, Georg Meggle, Saskia K. Nagel, Uwe Meyer, Arnim Regenbogen, Jan Slaby, Achim Stephan, Rainer Trapp and Sven Walter.<\/p>\n

E7<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph (Ed.): Morality in Times of Naturalising the Mind. Boston; Berlin: de Gruyter 2014. 5\u00ba; 212 pp. – With contributions by: Arnaldo Benini, Antonella Corradini, Christoph Lumer, Michael Pauen, Massimo Reichlin and Maureen Sie. – With contributions by: Arnaldo Benini, Antonella Corradini, Christoph Lumer, Michael Pauen, Massimo Reichlin and Maureen Sie.<\/p>\n

E8<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph; Giacomo Romano (Eds.): From Philsophy of Action to Philosophy of Mind \u2013 Reflections in Honour of Sandro Nannini. („Dalla filosofia dell\u2019azione alla filosofia della mente \u2013 Riflessioni in onore di Sandro Nannini“, in Italian.) Messina: corisco 2018. 235 pp. \u2013 With contributions by: Mario De Caro, Sara Dellantonio, Rosaria Egidi, Roberta Lanfredini, Christoph Lumer, Sandro Nannini, Paolo Parrini, Pietro Perconti, Claudio Pizzi, Emanuela Scribano, Giuseppe Varnier. \u2013 Open access: <http:\/\/www.coriscoedizioni.it\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/03\/dalla-filosofia-dellazione-alla-filosofia-della-mente.pdf<\/a>>.<\/p>\n

E9<\/em>\u2014\u041b\u0443\u043c\u0435\u0440, \u041a\u0440\u0456\u0441\u0442\u043e\u0444; \u0421\u0435\u0440\u0433\u0456\u0439 \u0421\u0435\u043a\u0443\u043d\u0434\u0430\u043d\u0442 (eds.): \u0422\u0435\u043e\u0440\u0456\u044f \u0410\u0440\u0433\u0443\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0442\u0430\u0446\u0456\u0457. \u0415\u043f\u0456\u0441\u0442\u0435\u043c\u043e\u043b\u043e\u0433\u0456\u0447\u043d\u0438\u0439 \u041f\u0456\u0434\u0445\u0456\u0434 (\u0410\u043d\u0442\u043e\u043b\u043e\u0433\u0456\u044f). Vol. 1: \u041a\u0440\u0438\u0442\u0438\u0447\u043d\u0435 \u043c\u0438\u0441\u043b\u0435\u043d\u043d\u044f \u0442\u0430 \u0435\u043f\u0456\u0441\u0442\u0435\u043c\u043e\u043b\u043e\u0433\u0456\u0447\u043d\u0438\u0439 \u043f\u0456\u0434\u0445\u0456\u0434 \u0434\u043e \u0430\u0440\u0433\u0443\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0442\u0430\u0446\u0456\u0457. \u041e\u0434\u0435\u0441\u0430: \u041d\u0430\u0437\u0430\u0440\u0447\u0443\u043a \u0421.\u041b. 2025. 344 pp. (In Ukrainian.) [Lumer, Christoph; Sergij Sekundant (eds.): Theory of Argumentation. Epistemological Approach (Anthology). Vol. 1: Critical Thinking and Epistemological Approach to Argumentation. Odessa: Nazarchuk S.L. 2025. 344 pp.] \u2013 With contributions by: Sharon Bailin; Mark E. Battersby; John Biro; Richard Feldman; Alvin Goldman; Christoph Lumer; Sergii Sekundant; Harvey Siegel.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

III.\u00a0Articles<\/strong><\/h2>\n

A1<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: The Disputation. A Special Type of Cooperative Argumentative Dialogue. In: Argumentation 2 (1988). Pp. 441-464.<\/p>\n

A2<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: Aims and Methods of Philosophy. („Ziele und Methoden der Philosophie“, in German.) In: Aufgaben der Philosophie heute. Arbeitstagung des Fachbereichs Kultur- und Geowissenschaften (Universit\u00e4t Osnabr\u00fcck) in Verbindung mit dem Istituto di Filosofia (Universit\u00e0 degli Studi di Urbino), 24. – 26. Oktober 1988. Osnabr\u00fcck: Osnabr\u00fccker Philosophische Schriften [1989]. Pp. 108-132.<\/p>\n

A3<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: Argument, Theory of Argumentation. („Argumentation, Argumentationstheorie“, in German.) In: Hans J\u00f6rg Sandk\u00fchler (ed.): Europ\u00e4ische Enzyklop\u00e4die zu Philosophie und Wissenschaften. Vol. 1. Hamburg: Meiner 1990. Pp. 246-255.<\/p>\n

A4<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: Justification. („Begr\u00fcndung“, in German.) In: Hans J\u00f6rg Sandk\u00fchler (ed.): Europ\u00e4ische Enzyklop\u00e4die zu Philosophie und Wissenschaften. Vol. 1. Hamburg: Meiner 1990. Pp. 364-369.<\/p>\n

A5<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: The Contribution of Philosophy to the Improvement of Argumentation: the Development of Criteria for Valid Arguments. („Der philosophische Beitrag zur Verbesserung des Argumentierens: die Entwicklung von G\u00fcltigkeitskriterien f\u00fcr Argumentationen“, in German.) In: Harm Paschen; Lothar Wigger (ed.): \u00dcber die Bedingungen der Verbesserung des Argumentierens. Dokumentation der Tagung: „Bedingungen der Verbesserung des Argumentierens“ vom 27 und 28. April 1989 im Zentrum f\u00fcr interdisziplin\u00e4re Forschung (ZiF) der Universit\u00e4t Bielefeld. Bielefeld 1990. Pp. 59-74.<\/p>\n

A6<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: Confirmation. („Best\u00e4tigung“, in German.) In: Hans J\u00f6rg Sandk\u00fchler (ed.): Europ\u00e4ische Enzyklop\u00e4die zu Philosophie und Wissenschaften. Vol. 1. Hamburg: Meiner 1990. Pp. 373-378.<\/p>\n

A7<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: Discourse and Argumentation Theory of Truth and Rationality? („Diskurs- und Argumentationstheorie der Wahrheit und Rationalit\u00e4t?“, in German.) In: Ethik und Sozialwissenschaften. 1 (1990). Pp. 363-365.<\/p>\n

A8<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: Validity. („Geltung – G\u00fcltigkeit“, in German.)
\n1. First version in:<\/em> Hans J\u00f6rg Sandk\u00fchler (ed.): Europ\u00e4ische Enzyklop\u00e4die zu Philosophie und Wissenschaften. Vol. 2. Hamburg: Meiner 1990. Pp. 258-262.
\n2. Revised version in:<\/em> Hans J\u00f6rg Sandk\u00fchler (ed.): Enzyklop\u00e4die Philosophie. Vol. 1. Hamburg: Meiner 1999. Pp. 450-455.
\n3. Strongly revised and enlarged version in:<\/em> Hans J\u00f6rg Sandk\u00fchler (ed.): Enzyklop\u00e4die Philosophie. [2nd, revised and enlarged ed.] Vol. 1. Ham\u00adburg: Meiner 2010. Pp. 811-818.<\/p>\n

A9<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: Action. („Handlung“, in German.) In: Hans J\u00f6rg Sandk\u00fchler (ed.): Europ\u00e4ische Enzyklop\u00e4die zu Philosophie und Wissenschaften. Vol. 2. Hamburg: Meiner 1990. Pp. 499-511.<\/p>\n

A10<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: Theories of Action. („Handlungstheorien“, in German.) In: Hans J\u00f6rg Sandk\u00fchler (ed.): Europ\u00e4ische Enzyklop\u00e4die zu Philosophie und Wissenschaften. Vol. 2. Hamburg: Meiner 1990. Pp. 511-514.<\/p>\n

A11<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: Induction. („Induktion“, in German.) In: Hans J\u00f6rg Sandk\u00fchler (ed.): Europ\u00e4ische Enzyklop\u00e4die zu Philosophie und Wissenschaften. Vol. 2. Hamburg: Meiner 1990. Pp. 659-676.<\/p>\n

A12<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: Cognitivism – Noncognitivism. („Kognitivismus – Nonkognitivismus“, in German.) In: Hans J\u00f6rg Sandk\u00fchler (ed.): Europ\u00e4ische Enzyklop\u00e4die zu Philosophie und Wissenschaften. Vol. 2. Hamburg: Meiner 1990. Pp. 821-824.<\/p>\n

A13<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: Normative – Descriptive – Actual. („Normativ – deskriptiv – faktisch“, in German.)
\n1. First version in:<\/em> Hans J\u00f6rg Sandk\u00fchler (ed.): Europ\u00e4ische Enzyklop\u00e4die zu Philosophie und Wissenschaften. Vol. 3. Hamburg: Meiner 1990. Pp. 588-592.
\n2. Completely revised and updated version in:<\/em> Hans J\u00f6rg Sandk\u00fchler (ed.): Enzyklop\u00e4die Philosophie. Vol. 1. Hamburg: Meiner 1999. Pp. 957-961.
\n3. Enlarged and further revised version in:<\/em> Hans J\u00f6rg Sandk\u00fchler (ed.): Enzyklop\u00e4die Philosophie. [2nd, revised and enlarged ed.] Vol. 1. Ham\u00adburg: Meiner 2010. Pp. 1805-1809.<\/p>\n

A14<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: Sentence, Statement. („Satz, Aussage“, in German.) In: Hans J\u00f6rg Sandk\u00fchler (ed.): Europ\u00e4ische Enzyklop\u00e4die zu Philosophie und Wissenschaften. Vol. 4. Hamburg: Meiner 1990. Pp. 177-188.<\/p>\n

A15<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: Argumentative Dialogues. A Philosophical Reconstruction of Disputation. („Argumentative Dialoge. Eine philosophische Rekonstruktion von Disputationen“, in German.) In: Sorin Stati; Edda Weigand; Franz Hundsnurscher (ed.): Dialoganalyse III. Referate der 3. Arbeitstagung Bologna 1990. Teil 1. T\u00fcbingen: Niemeyer 1991. Pp. 353-367.<\/p>\n

A16<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: Structure and Function of Argumentations. An Epistemological Approach to Determining Criteria for the Validity and Adequacy of Argumentations. In: Frans H. van Eemeren [et al.] (eds.): Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Argumentation. Organized by the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (ISSA) at the University of Amsterdam, June 19-22, 1990. Amsterdam: Sicsat 1991. Pp. 98-107.<\/p>\n

A17<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: Action Explaining Interpretation as a Means for Analyzing Semantical Meaning. („Handlungstheoretisch erkl\u00e4rende Interpretationen als Mittel der semantischen Bedeutungsanalyse“, in German.) In: Lutz Danneberg; Friedrich Vollhardt (eds.): Vom Umgang mit Literatur und Literaturgeschichte. Positionen und Perspektiven nach der „Theoriedebatte“. Stuttgart: Metzler 1992. Pp. 75-113.<\/p>\n

A18<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: The Gap between Judgment and Action and the Meaning of „x is Good for Person y“. („Die L\u00fccke zwischen Urteil und Handeln und die Bedeutung von „x ist gut f\u00fcr die Person y““, in German.) In: Christoph Fehige; Georg Meggle (eds.): Zum moralischen Denken. Vol. 1. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp 1995. Pp. 254-281.<\/p>\n

A19<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: The Theoretical Approach of the Practical Theory of Argumentation. („Der theoretische Ansatz der Praktischen Argumentationstheorie“, in German.) In: Harald Wohlrapp (ed.): Wege der Argumentationsforschung. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: frommann-holzboog 1995. Pp. 81-101.
\nUkrainian Translation:<\/em> \u0422\u0435\u043e\u0440\u0435\u0442\u0438\u0447\u043d\u0438\u0439 \u041f\u0456\u0434\u0445\u0456\u0434 \u0414\u043e \u041f\u0440\u0430\u043a\u0442\u0438\u0447\u043d\u043e\u0457 \u0422\u0435\u043e\u0440\u0456\u0457 \u0410\u0440\u0433\u0443\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0442\u0430\u0446\u0456\u0457. In: \u041b\u0443\u043c\u0435\u0440, \u041a\u0440\u0456\u0441\u0442\u043e\u0444; \u0421\u0435\u0440\u0433\u0456\u0439 \u0421\u0435\u043a\u0443\u043d\u0434\u0430\u043d\u0442 (eds.): \u0422\u0435\u043e\u0440\u0456\u044f \u0410\u0440\u0433\u0443\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0442\u0430\u0446\u0456\u0457. \u0415\u043f\u0456\u0441\u0442\u0435\u043c\u043e\u043b\u043e\u0433\u0456\u0447\u043d\u0438\u0439 \u041f\u0456\u0434\u0445\u0456\u0434 (\u0410\u043d\u0442\u043e\u043b\u043e\u0433\u0456\u044f). Vol. 1: \u041a\u0440\u0438\u0442\u0438\u0447\u043d\u0435 \u043c\u0438\u0441\u043b\u0435\u043d\u043d\u044f \u0442\u0430 \u0435\u043f\u0456\u0441\u0442\u0435\u043c\u043e\u043b\u043e\u0433\u0456\u0447\u043d\u0438\u0439 \u043f\u0456\u0434\u0445\u0456\u0434 \u0434\u043e \u0430\u0440\u0433\u0443\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0442\u0430\u0446\u0456\u0457. \u041e\u0434\u0435\u0441\u0430: \u041d\u0430\u0437\u0430\u0440\u0447\u0443\u043a \u0421.\u041b. 2025: 221-238.<\/p>\n

A20<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: What is a Sound Justification of Morals? („Was ist eine triftige Moralbegr\u00fcndung?“, in German.) In: Georg Meggle; Ulla Wessels (eds.): Analyomen 1. Proceedings of the 1st Conference „Perspectives in Analytical Philosophy“. Berlin; New York: de Gruyter 1994. Pp. 785-796.<\/p>\n

A21<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: Which Preferences Shall Be the Basis of Rational Decision? In: Christoph Fehige; Ulla Wessels (eds.): Preferences. Berlin; New York: de Gruyter 1998. Pp. 33-56.<\/p>\n

A22<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: Ethics Aggregating Desirability Instead of Ethics of the Weighting Reason. („W\u00fcnschbarkeitsaggregationsethik statt Ethik der abw\u00e4genden Vernunft“, in German). In: Ethik und Sozialwissenschaften 4 (1993). Pp. 618-620.<\/p>\n

A23<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: Habermas‘ Discourse Ethics. („Habermas‘ Diskursethik“, in German.) In: Zeitschrift f\u00fcr philosophische Forschung 51 (1997). Pp. 42-64.<\/p>\n

A24<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: Propositions. („Propositionen“, in German.) In: Wolfgang Lenzen (ed.): Tractatus physico-philosophici. Festschrift f\u00fcr Andreas Kamlah. Osnabr\u00fcck: Osnabr\u00fccker philosophische Schriften 1993. Pp. 115-144.<\/p>\n

A25<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: Motivation for Moral Action and Discourse Ethics. („Motivation zu moralischem Handeln und Diskursethik“, in German.) In: Jean-Paul Harpes; Wolfgang Kuhlmann (eds.): Zur Relevanz der Diskursethik. Anwendungsprobleme der Diskursethik in Wirtschaft und Politik. Dokumentation des Kolloquiums in Luxemburg (10.-12. Dezember 1993). M\u00fcnster: Lit 1997. Pp. 5-22.<\/p>\n

A26<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: Rules and Moral Norms in Sports. In: International Review for the Sociology of Sport 30 (1995). Pp. 263-281.<\/p>\n

A27<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: Practical Arguments for Theoretical Theses.
\n1. Revised and improved version in:<\/em> Argumentation 11 (1997). Pp. 329-340.
\n2. Original version in:<\/em> Frans H. van Eemeren [et al.] (eds.): Analysis and Evaluation. Proceedings of the Third ISSA Conference on Argumentation (University of Amsterdam, June 21-24, 1994). Vol. II. Amsterdam: Sic Sat 1995. Pp. 91-101.<\/p>\n

A28<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: Implicatures – General Theory and Applications in the Theory of Argumentation. („Implikaturen – Allgemeine Theorie und argumentationstheoretische Anwendung“, in German.) In: Frank Liedtke (ed.): Implikaturen. Grammatische und pragmatische Analysen. T\u00fcbingen: Niemeyer 1995. Pp. 165-186.<\/p>\n

A29<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: Inferences from Is to Ought and Other Types of Justifying Morals. („Sein-Sollen-Schl\u00fcsse und andere Typen der Moralbegr\u00fcndung“, in German.) In: Ethik und Sozialwissenschaften 6 (1995). Pp. 203-206.<\/p>\n

A30<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: Cognitive Theory of Action – the Methodological Approach. („Kognitive Handlungs-theorie – der methodische Ansatz“, in German.) In: Georg Meggle (ed.): Analyomen 2. Proceedings of the 2nd Conference „Perspectives in Analytical Philosophy“. Vol. III: Philosophy of Mind, Practical Philosophy, Miscellanea. Berlin; New York: de Gruyter. 1997. Pp. 263-270.<\/p>\n

A31<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: Hedonism Corrected for the Valuing Personality. („Pers\u00f6nlichkeitstheoretisch korrigierter Hedonismus“, in German.) In: Christoph Hubig; Hans Poser (eds.): Cognitio humana – Dynamik des Wissens und der Werte. XVII. Deutscher Kongre\u00df f\u00fcr Philosophie Leipzig 1996. Workshop-Beitr\u00e4ge vol. 1. Berlin: ProduServ 1996. Pp. 132-139.<\/p>\n

A32<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: Utilex – Distributive Justice Based on Sympathy. („Utilex – Verteilungsgerechtigkeit auf Empathiebasis“, in German.) In: Peter Koller; Klaus Puhl (eds.): Current Issues in Political Philosophy. Justice in Society and World Order. Wien: H\u00f6lder-Pichler-Tempsky 1997. Pp. 99-110.<\/p>\n

A33<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: Theory of Argumentation and Logic. („Argumentationstheorie und Logik“, in German.) In: Geert-Lueke Lueken (ed.): Formen der Argu\u00admentation. Leipzig: Leipziger Universit\u00e4tsverlag 2000. Pp. 53-71.<\/p>\n

A34<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: Who or what Counts in Ecological Ethics? („Wer oder was z\u00e4hlt in der \u00f6kologischen Ethik?“, in German.) In: Julian Nida-R\u00fcmelin (ed.): Rationalit\u00e4t, Realismus, Revision. Vortr\u00e4ge des 3. internationalen Kongresses der Gesellschaft f\u00fcr Analytische Philosophie vom 15. bis zum 18. September 1997 in M\u00fcnchen. Berlin; New York: de Gruyter 1999. Pp. 633-639.<\/p>\n

A35<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: The Content of Originally Intrinsic Desires and of Intrinsic Motivation. In: Acta analytica 18 (1997). Pp. 107-121.<\/p>\n

A36<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: H\u00f6ffe’s Theory of Political Justice. („H\u00f6ffes Theorie politischer Gerechtigkeit“, in German.) In: Helen Bohse; Sven Walter (eds.): Selected Contributions to GAP.6, Sixth International Conference of the Society for Analytical Philosophy, Berlin, 11-14 September 2006. (CD-ROM.) Paderborn: Mentis 2008. Pp. 741-763.<\/p>\n

A37<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: Argument, Theory of Argumentation. („Argument, Argumentationstheorie“, in German.)
\n1. First version in:<\/em> Hans J\u00f6rg Sandk\u00fchler (ed.): Enzyklop\u00e4die Philosophie. Vol. 1. Hamburg: Meiner 1999. Pp. 88-95.
\n2. <\/em>Revised and updated version in:<\/em> Hans J\u00f6rg Sandk\u00fchler (ed.): Enzyklop\u00e4die Philosophie. [2nd, revised and enlarged ed.] Vol. 1. Ham\u00adburg: Meiner 2010. Pp. 151-158.<\/p>\n

A38<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: Justification. („Begr\u00fcndung“, in German.)
\n1. First version in:<\/em> Hans J\u00f6rg Sandk\u00fchler (ed.): Enzyklop\u00e4die Philosophie. Vol. 1. Hamburg: Meiner 1999. Pp. 149-156.
\n2. Revised and updated version in:<\/em> Hans J\u00f6rg Sandk\u00fchler (ed.): Enzyklop\u00e4die Philosophie. [2nd, revised and enlarged ed.] Vol. 1. Ham\u00adburg: Meiner 2010. Pp. 255-262.<\/p>\n

A39<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: The Greenhouse Effect – Moral Evaluation and Moral Duties. („Der Treibhauseffekt – moralische Bewertung und moralische Pflichten“, in German.) In: Peter Kampits; Karoly Kokai; Anja Weiberg (eds.): Angewandte Ethik. Beitr\u00e4ge des 21. Wittgenstein Symposiums. 16.-22. August 1998, Kirchberg am Wechsel. Vol. 2. Kirchberg am Wechsel: \u00d6sterreichische Ludwig Wittgenstein Gesellschaft 1998. Pp. 41-48.<\/p>\n

A40<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: Intergenerational Justice. A Challenge to Ethical Universalism and Moral Motivation. („Intergenerationelle Gerechtigkeit. Eine Herausforderung f\u00fcr den ethischen Universalismus und die moralische Motivation“, in German.) In: Reinhold Mokrosch; Arnim Regenbogen (eds.): Was hei\u00dft Gerechtigkeit? Ethische Perspektiven zu Erziehung, Politik und Religion. Donauw\u00f6rth: Auer 1999. Pp. 82-95.<\/p>\n

A41<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: Sources of Morals – A Plea for a Prudential Altruism. („Quellen der Moral – Pl\u00e4doyer f\u00fcr einen prudentiellen Altruismus“, in German.) In: Concep\u00adtus 32 (1999). Pp. 185-216.<\/p>\n

A42<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: Reductionism in Fallacy Theory.
\n1. Full version in:<\/em> Argumentation 14 (2000). Pp. 405-423.
\n2. Abridged version in:<\/em> Frans H. van Eemeren; Rob Grootendorst; J. Anthony Blair; Charles A. Willard (eds.): Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation. Amsterdam: SIC SAT 1999. Pp. 537-542.<\/p>\n

A43<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: Statement, Sentence. („Aussage, Satz“, in German). In: Hans J\u00f6rg Sandk\u00fchler (ed.): Enzyklop\u00e4die Philosophie. Vol. 1. Hamburg: Meiner 1999. Pp. 104-109.<\/p>\n

A44<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: Assertion. („Behauptung“, in German.)
\n1. First version in:<\/em> Hans J\u00f6rg Sandk\u00fchler (ed.): Enzyklop\u00e4die Philosophie. Vol. 1. Hamburg: Meiner 1999. Pp. 156-159.
\n2. Revised and updated version in:<\/em> Hans J\u00f6rg Sandk\u00fchler (ed.): Enzyklop\u00e4die Philosophie. [2nd, revised and enlarged ed.] Vol. 1. Ham\u00adburg: Meiner 2010. Pp. 262-266.<\/p>\n

A45<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: Proposition. („Proposition“, in German.) In: Hans J\u00f6rg Sandk\u00fchler (ed.): Enzyklop\u00e4die Philosophie. Vol. 2. Hamburg: Meiner 1999. Pp. 1320-1323.<\/p>\n

A46<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: Cognitivism \/ Noncognitivsm. („Kognitivismus \/ Nonkognitivismus“, in German.)
\n1. First version in:<\/em> Hans J\u00f6rg Sandk\u00fchler (ed.): Enzyklop\u00e4die Philosophie. Vol. 1. Hamburg: Meiner 1999. Pp. 695-699.
\n2. Revised and updated version in:<\/em> Hans J\u00f6rg Sandk\u00fchler (ed.): Enzyklop\u00e4die Philosophie. [2nd, revised and enlarged ed.] Vol. 1. Ham\u00adburg: Meiner 2010. Pp. 1246-1251.<\/p>\n

A47<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: Induction. („Induktion“, in German.)
\n1. First version in:<\/em> Hans J\u00f6rg Sandk\u00fchler (ed.): Enzyklop\u00e4die Philosophie. Vol. 1. Hamburg: Meiner 1999. Pp. 629-636.
\n2. Revised and updated version in:<\/em> Hans J\u00f6rg Sandk\u00fchler (ed.): Enzyklop\u00e4die Philosophie. [2nd, revised and enlarged ed.] Ham\u00adburg: Meiner 2010. Pp. 1097-1105.<\/p>\n

A48<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: Action \/ Theories of Action. („Handlung \/ Handlungstheorien“, in German.)
\n1. First <\/em>version in:<\/em> Hans J\u00f6rg Sandk\u00fchler (ed.): Enzyklop\u00e4die Philosophie. Vol. 1. Hamburg: Meiner 1999. Pp. 534-547.
\n2. <\/em>Strongly revised and updated version in:<\/em> Hans J\u00f6rg Sandk\u00fchler (ed.): Enzyklop\u00e4die Philosophie. [2nd, revised and enlarged ed.] Vol. 1. Ham\u00adburg: Meiner 2010. Pp. 967-980.<\/p>\n

A49<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: Justice. („Gerechtigkeit“, in German.) In: Hans J\u00f6rg Sandk\u00fchler (ed.): Enzyklop\u00e4die Philosophie. Vol. 1. Hamburg: Meiner 1999. Pp. 464-470.<\/p>\n

A50<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: Motives for Moral Action. („Motive zu moralischem Handeln“, in German.) In: Analyse & Kritik 24 (2002). Pp. 163-188.<\/p>\n

A51<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: Integrative Ethics of Economics Does Better without Discourse Ethics. („Integrative Wirtschaftsethik besser ohne Diskursethik“, in German.) In: Ethik und Sozialwissenschaften 11 (2000). Pp. 598-601.<\/p>\n

A52<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: Greenhouse Effect and Responsibility for the Future. („Treibhauseffekt und Zukunftsverantwortung“, in German.) In: Dieter Birnbacher; Gerd Bru\u00adderm\u00fcller (eds.): Zukunftsverantwortung und Generationensolidarit\u00e4t. W\u00fcrzburg: K\u00f6nigshausen und Neumann 2001. Pp. 185-225.<\/p>\n

A53<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: Preferences. („Pr\u00e4ferenzen“, in German.) In: Marcus D\u00fcwell; Christoph H\u00fcbenthal; Micha H. Werner (eds.): Handbuch Ethik. Stuttgart; Weimar: Metzler 2002. Pp. 453-457. 2nd, updated and enlarged edition 2006. Pp. 470-474.<\/p>\n

A54<\/i>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: Libet’s Experiments and the Possibility of Free Conscious Decision. In: Christoph Lumer (ed.): Morality in Times of Naturalising the Mind. Boston; Berlin: de Gruyter 2014. Pp. 63-103.<\/p>\n

A55<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: Kantian Externalism and Motives for Moral Action. („Kantischer Externalismus und Motive zu moralischem Handeln“, in German.)<\/p>\n

1. Full version in:<\/em> Conceptus 35 (2002\/03). Pp. 263-286.
\n2. <\/em>Abridged version appeared in an e-book:<\/em> CD-rom: Ansgar Beckermann; Christian Nimtz (eds.): Argument & Analyse. Sektionsvortr\u00e4ge. Ausgew\u00e4hlte Sektionsvortr\u00e4ge des 4. Internationalen Kongresses der Gesellschaft f\u00fcr Analytische Philosophie, Bielefeld September 2000. – Web: <www.gap-im-netz.de\/gap4Konf\/Proceedings4\/Proc.htm<\/a>>.<\/p>\n

A56<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: Intentions Are Optimality Beliefs – but Optimizing what? In: Erkenntnis 62 (2005). Pp. 235-262.<\/p>\n

A57<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: Freedom of Choice. („Entscheidungsfreiheit“, in German.) In: Wolfram Hogrebe (ed.): Grenzen und Grenz\u00fcberschreitungen. XIX. Deutscher Kongre\u00df f\u00fcr Philosophie, 23.-27. September 2002 in Bonn. Sektionsbeitr\u00e4ge. Bonn: Sinclair Press 2002. Pp. 197-207.<\/p>\n

A58<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: A Maximin Principle for the Distribution of Commodities – Koller’s Theory of Social Justice. („Ein Maximinprinzip der G\u00fcterverteilung – Zu Kollers Theorie der sozialen Gerechtigkeit“, in German.) In: Erw\u00e4gen Wissen Ethik (formerly: Ethik und Sozialwissenschaften) 14 (2003). Pp. 276-278.<\/p>\n

A59<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: Interpreting Arguments. In: Frans H. van Eemeren; J. An\u00adthony Blair; Charles A. Willard; A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans (eds.): Proceedings of the Fifth International Confe\u00adrence of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation. Amsterdam: SIC SAT 2003. Pp. 715-719.<\/p>\n

A60<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: Principles of generational justice.
\n1. English version in:<\/em> Joerg Chet Tremmel (ed.): Handbook of Intergenerational Justice. Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar 2006. Pp. 39-52. – URL of the english version at Equality Exchange: <http:\/\/mora.rente.nhh.no\/projects\/EqualityExchange\/Portals\/0\/articles\/lumerjustice_.pdf>.
\n2. <\/em>Original version in German:<\/em> Prinzipien der Generationengerechtigkeit. In: Stiftung f\u00fcr die Rechte zuk\u00fcnftiger Generationen (ed.): Handbuch Generationengerechtigkeit. M\u00fcnchen: \u00f6kom Verlag 2003. Pp. 105-123.<\/p>\n

A61<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: The Moral Status of the Human Embryo – Justified Internalistically. („Der moralische Status von Embryonen – internalistisch begr\u00fcndet“, in German.) In: Wolfgang Lenzen (ed.): Der moralische Status von Embryonen. Paderborn: Mentis 2004. Pp. 212-249.<\/p>\n

A62<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: The Primate of Values – Value Ethics Versus Deontological and Virtue Ethics. („Vom Primat der Werte – Wertethik versus Pflicht- und Tugendethik“, in German.) In: Reinhold Mokrosch; Elk Franke (eds.): Wertethik und Werterziehung. G\u00f6ttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht unipress 2004. Pp. 39-61.<\/p>\n

A63<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: Utilitarianism. („Utilitarismus“, in German.) In: Stefan Gosepath; Wilfried Hinsch; Beate R\u00f6ssler (eds.): Handbuch der Politischen Philosophie und Sozialphilosophie. Berlin; New York: de Gruyter 2008. Vol. 2. Pp. 1380-1387.<\/p>\n

A64<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: Desires and Explanatory Reasons. In: Roland Bluhm; Christian Nimtz (eds.): Selected Papers Contributed to the Sections of GAP.5, Fifth International Congress of the Society for Analytical Philosophy, Bielefeld, 22-26 September 2003. (CD-ROM.) Paderborn: Mentis 2004. Pp. 704-714.<\/p>\n

A65<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: Analytical Philosophy and Logic. („Analytische Philosophie und Logik“, in German.) In: Wechselwirkung, issue 131 (27th year [2005]). Pp. 70-73.<\/p>\n

A66<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: Prioritarian Welfare Functions – An Elaboration and Justification. Working paper University of Siena, Department of Philosophy and Social Sciences 2005. 43 pp. Web, URL: http:\/\/www.lumer.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/A066_Lumer_Prioritarian
\nWelfareFunctions.pdf<\/a>.<\/p>\n

A67<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: An Empirical Theory of Practical Reasons and its Use for Practical Philosophy. In: Christoph Lumer; Sandro Nannini (eds.): Intentionality, Deliberation and Autonomy. The Action-Theoretic Basis of Practical Philosophy. Aldershot: Ashgate 2007. Pp. 157-186.<\/p>\n

A68<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: The Epistemological Theory of Argument – How and Why? In: Informal Logic 25 (2005). Pp. 213-243.
\nUkrainian Translation:<\/em> \u0415\u043f\u0456\u0441\u0442\u0435\u043c\u043e\u043b\u043e\u0433\u0456\u0447\u043d\u0430 \u0442\u0435\u043e\u0440\u0456\u044f \u0430\u0440\u0433\u0443\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0442\u0430. \u044f\u043a \u0456 \u0447\u043e\u043c\u0443?. In: \u041b\u0443\u043c\u0435\u0440, \u041a\u0440\u0456\u0441\u0442\u043e\u0444; \u0421\u0435\u0440\u0433\u0456\u0439 \u0421\u0435\u043a\u0443\u043d\u0434\u0430\u043d\u0442 (eds.): \u0422\u0435\u043e\u0440\u0456\u044f \u0410\u0440\u0433\u0443\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0442\u0430\u0446\u0456\u0457. \u0415\u043f\u0456\u0441\u0442\u0435\u043c\u043e\u043b\u043e\u0433\u0456\u0447\u043d\u0438\u0439 \u041f\u0456\u0434\u0445\u0456\u0434 (\u0410\u043d\u0442\u043e\u043b\u043e\u0433\u0456\u044f). Vol. 1: \u041a\u0440\u0438\u0442\u0438\u0447\u043d\u0435 \u043c\u0438\u0441\u043b\u0435\u043d\u043d\u044f \u0442\u0430 \u0435\u043f\u0456\u0441\u0442\u0435\u043c\u043e\u043b\u043e\u0433\u0456\u0447\u043d\u0438\u0439 \u043f\u0456\u0434\u0445\u0456\u0434 \u0434\u043e \u0430\u0440\u0433\u0443\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0442\u0430\u0446\u0456\u0457. \u041e\u0434\u0435\u0441\u0430: \u041d\u0430\u0437\u0430\u0440\u0447\u0443\u043a \u0421.\u041b. 2025: 239-277.<\/p>\n

A69<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: Lumer, Christoph: Reason \/ Argument \/ Argumentation. („Argument \/ Argumentation“, in German.) In: Petra Kolmer; Armin G. Wildfeuer (eds.): Neues Handbuch philosophischer Grundbegriffe. Freiburg i.Br.; M\u00fcnchen: Alber 2011. Vol. 1. Pp. 227-240.<\/p>\n

A70<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: The Epistemological Approach to Argumentation – A Map. In: Informal Logic 25 (2005). Pp. 189-212.
\nUkrainian Translation:<\/em> \u0415\u043f\u0456\u0441\u0442\u0435\u043c\u043e\u043b\u043e\u0433\u0456\u0447\u043d\u0438\u0439 \u043f\u0456\u0434\u0445\u0456\u0434 \u0434\u043e \u0430\u0440\u0433\u0443\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0442\u0430\u0446\u0456\u0457. \u041a\u0430\u0440\u0442\u0430. In: \u041b\u0443\u043c\u0435\u0440, \u041a\u0440\u0456\u0441\u0442\u043e\u0444; \u0421\u0435\u0440\u0433\u0456\u0439 \u0421\u0435\u043a\u0443\u043d\u0434\u0430\u043d\u0442 (eds.): \u0422\u0435\u043e\u0440\u0456\u044f \u0410\u0440\u0433\u0443\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0442\u0430\u0446\u0456\u0457. \u0415\u043f\u0456\u0441\u0442\u0435\u043c\u043e\u043b\u043e\u0433\u0456\u0447\u043d\u0438\u0439 \u041f\u0456\u0434\u0445\u0456\u0434 (\u0410\u043d\u0442\u043e\u043b\u043e\u0433\u0456\u044f). Vol. 1: \u041a\u0440\u0438\u0442\u0438\u0447\u043d\u0435 \u043c\u0438\u0441\u043b\u0435\u043d\u043d\u044f \u0442\u0430 \u0435\u043f\u0456\u0441\u0442\u0435\u043c\u043e\u043b\u043e\u0433\u0456\u0447\u043d\u0438\u0439 \u043f\u0456\u0434\u0445\u0456\u0434 \u0434\u043e \u0430\u0440\u0433\u0443\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0442\u0430\u0446\u0456\u0457. \u041e\u0434\u0435\u0441\u0430: \u041d\u0430\u0437\u0430\u0440\u0447\u0443\u043a \u0421.\u041b. 2025: 63-91.<\/p>\n

A71<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: Pragma-Dialectics and the Function of Argumentation.
\n1. Full version in:<\/em> Argumentation 24 (2010). Pp. 41-69.
\n2. Abridged version in:<\/em> Frans H. van Eemeren; J. An\u00adthony Blair; Charles A. Willard; Bart Garssen (eds.): Proceedings of the Sixth of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation. Amsterdam: SIC SAT 2007. Pp. 909-915.<\/p>\n

A72<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: Persuading is Good, Convincing is Better! Argumentative Ethos in Rhetoric. („\u00dcberreden ist gut, \u00fcberzeugen ist besser! Argumentativer Ethos in der Rhetorik“, in German.) In: G\u00fcnther Kreuzbauer; Norbert Gratzl; Ewald Hiebl (eds.): Persuasion und Wissenschaft. Aktuelle Fragestellungen von Rhetorik und Argumentationstheorie. Wien: Lit Verlag 2007. Pp. 7-33.<\/p>\n

A73<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: Cognitivism and Practical Justification. („Kognitivismus und praktische Begr\u00fcndung“, in German.) In: G\u00fcnther Kreuzbauer; Norbert Gratzl; Ewald Hiebl (eds.): Persuasion und Wissenschaft. Aktuelle Fragestellungen von Rhetorik und Argumentationstheorie. Wien: Lit Verlag 2007. Pp. 165-177.<\/p>\n

A74<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: The Action-Theoretic Basis of Practical Philosophy. In: Christoph Lumer; Sandro Nannini (eds.): Intentionality, Deliberation and Autonomy. The Action-Theoretic Basis of Practical Philosophy. Aldershot: Ashgate 2007. Pp. 1-13.<\/p>\n

A75<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: Intentions – what They Are Conceptually and what They Are Empirically. („Absichten – begrifflich und empirisch“, in German.) In: Helen Bohse; Sven Walter (eds.): Selected Papers Contributed to the Sections of GAP.6, Sixth International Congress of the Society for Analytical Philosophy, Berlin, 11-14 September 2006. (CD-ROM, ISBN: 978-3-89785-589-2.) Paderborn: Mentis 2008. Pp. 976-994.<\/p>\n

A76<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: Altruism, Egoism. („Altruismus \/ Egoismus“, in German.) In: Stefan Jordan; Christian Nimtz (eds.): Grundbegriffe der Philosophie. Stuttgart: Reclam (2009; 2<\/sup>2011); 3<\/sup>2019: 23-26.<\/p>\n

A77<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: Priority for Who Is Worse off. Moral Values and Norms in Ethical Prioritarianism. („Priorit\u00e0 per chi sta peggio. Valori e norme morali nel prioritarismo etico“, in Italian.) In: Christoph Lumer (ed.): Etica normativa – principi dell’agire morale. Roma: Carocci 2008. Pp. 93-116.<\/p>\n

A78<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: Moral Desirability and Rational Decision. In: Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 13 (2010). Pp. 561-584.<\/p>\n

A79<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: Ethical Arguments. („Ethische Argumentationen“, in German.) In: Johann S. Ach; Kurt Bayertz; Ludwig Siep (eds.): Grundkurs Ethik. Band I: Grundlagen. Paderborn: Mentis 2008;\u00a02<\/sup>2011. Pp. 121-142.<\/p>\n

A80<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: Objectivity and the Difference Between Ethics and Science. [On Gerhard Ernst’s „The Objectivity of Morals“.] („Objektivit\u00e4t und der Unterschied zwischen Ethik und Wissenschaft [\u00dcber Gerhard Ernsts \u201eDie Objektivit\u00e4t der Moral\u201c], in German.) In: Zeitschrift f\u00fcr philosophische Forschung 64 (2010). Pp. 91-97.<\/p>\n

A81<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: Normative Ethics – in Search of Principles for Moral Action. („Etica normativa – alla ricerca dei principi dell’agire morale“, in Italian.) In: Christoph Lumer (ed.): Etica normativa – principi dell’agire morale. Roma: Carocci 2008. Pp. 7-12.<\/p>\n

A82<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: Introduction: The Relevance of Rational Decision Theory for Ethics. In: Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 13 (2010). Pp. 485-496.<\/p>\n

A83<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: Ethical Arguments for Moral Principles and the Type of Theory of Normative Ethics. („Ethische Argumentationen f\u00fcr moralische Prinzipien und der Theorietyp der materialen Ethik“, in German.) In: [Deutsche Gesellschaft f\u00fcr Philosophie (ed.)]: Lebenswelt und Wissenschaft. XXI. Deutscher Kongress f\u00fcr Philosophie. Universit\u00e4t Duisburg-Essen, Campus Essen, 15.-19.9.2008. Sektionsbeitr\u00e4ge. CD-rom (ISBN 978-3-00-025531-1). [Essen: Deutsche Gesellschaft f\u00fcr Philosophie] 2008. Sektion 04: Argumentation und Rhetorik. (Beitrag 04_Lumer.pdf.) 18 pp.<\/p>\n

A84<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: Deviant Realisation of Intentions and Controlling Actions. An Intentional Causalist Explanation. („Abwegige Absichtsrealisierung und Handlungssteuerung. Eine intentional-kausalistische Erkl\u00e4rung“, in German.) In: Internationale Zeitschrift f\u00fcr Philosophie 1\/2008. Pp. 9-37.<\/p>\n

A85<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: What is Practical Knowledge? In: Mario De Caro; Rosaria Egidi (eds.): The Architecture of Theoretical and Practical Knowledge. Epistemology, Agency, and Science. Roma: Carocci; Universit\u00e0 degli Studi Roma Tre 2010. Pp. 105-130.<\/p>\n

A86<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: How to Interpret Human Actions (Including Moral Actions). In: Peter Machamer; Gereon Wolters (eds.): Interpretation. Ways of Thinking about the Sciences and the Arts. Pittsburgh, PA.: Pittsburgh U.P. 2010. Pp. 130-157.<\/p>\n

A87<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: Statement \/ Sentence \/ Proposition. („Aussage \/ Satz \/ Proposition“, in German.) In: Hans J\u00f6rg Sandk\u00fchler (ed.): Enzyklop\u00e4die Philosophie. [2nd, revised and enlarged ed.] Vol. 1. Ham\u00adburg: Meiner 2010. Pp. 189-195.<\/p>\n

A88<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: Ethics of Humanitarian Interventions. A Consequentialist Conception. („Ethik humanit\u00e4rer Interventionen. Eine konsequentialistische Konzeption“, in German.) In: Christoph Fehige; Christoph Lumer; Ulla Wessels (eds.): Handeln mit Bedeutung und Handeln mit Gewalt. Philosophische Aufs\u00e4tze f\u00fcr Georg Meggle. Paderborn: mentis 2009. Pp. 324-347.<\/p>\n

A89<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: Preference. („Pr\u00e4ferenz“, in German.) In: Hans J\u00f6rg Sandk\u00fchler (ed.): Enzyklop\u00e4die Philosophie. [2nd, revised and enlarged ed.] Ham\u00adburg: Meiner 2010. Vol 2. Pp. 2108-2112.<\/p>\n

A90<\/i>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: Analytical Ethics. („Analytische Ethik“, in German.)
\n1. Original:<\/i> In: Hans J\u00f6rg Sandk\u00fchler (ed.): Enzyklop\u00e4die Philosophie. [2nd, revised and enlarged ed.] Ham\u00adburg: Meiner 2010. Vol 1. Pp. 633-640.
\n2. Reprint:<\/i> In: Horst D. Brandt (ed.): Disziplinen der Philosophie. Ein Kompendium. Hamburg: Meiner 2014. Pp. 43-59.<\/p>\n

A91<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: Climate Change, Intergenerational Justice and Development.
\n1. English original:<\/em> In: Intergenerational Justice Review. 9,3 (2009). Pp. 88-94.
\n2. German translation:<\/em> Klimawandel, Generationengerechtigkeit und Entwicklung. In: Journal f\u00fcr Generationengerechtigkeit 9.3 (2009). Pp. 88-95.<\/p>\n

A92<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: Persons in Permanent Vegetative State – Their Moral Status, their Moral Rights. („Menschen im permanenten vegetativen Zustand – ihr moralischer Status, ihre moralischen Rechte“, in German.)\u00a0In: Oliver Petersen; Dagmar Borchers; Thomas Spitzley; Manfred St\u00f6ckler (eds.): Proceedings von GAP.7 Nachdenken und Vordenken \u2013 Herausforderungen an die Philosophie. [Bremen, 14.-17.9.2009.] Online-publication University Duisburg-Essen (DuEPublico) 2012. Pp. 505-520. URL: <http:\/\/duepublico.uni-duisburg-essen.de\/servlets\/DerivateServlet\/Derivate-29983\/Proceeding_GAP7_Nachdenken_Vordenken.pdf<\/a>>.<\/p>\n

A93<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: Attributive Responsability – Sketch of a Theory. („Attributive Verantwortung – eine Theorieskizze“, in German.)\u00a0In: Oliver Petersen; Dagmar Borchers; Thomas Spitzley; Manfred St\u00f6ckler (eds.): Proceedings von GAP.7 Nachdenken und Vordenken \u2013 Herausforderungen an die Philosophie. [Bremen, 14.-17.9.2009.] Online-publication University Duisburg-Essen (DuEPublico) 2012. Pp. 703-722. URL: <http:\/\/duepublico.uni-duisburg-essen.de\/servlets\/DerivateServlet\/Derivate-29983\/Proceeding_GAP7_Nachdenken_Vordenken.pdf<\/a>>.<\/p>\n

A94<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: Probabilistic Arguments in the Epistemological Approach to Argumentation. In: Frans H. van Eemeren; Bart Garssen; David Godden; Gordon Mitchell (eds.): Proceedings of the 7th Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation. [Amsterdam, June 29 – July 2, 2010.] Amsterdam: Rozenberg; Sic Sat 2011. Pp. 1141-1154. (CD-rom.)<\/p>\n

A95<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: The Primate of Avoiding Suffering. From neminen laede <\/em>to Prioritarianism. (\u201eDer Primat der Leidensverminderung. Von neminem laede zum Prioritarismus\u201c, in German.) In: Christoph Lumer; Uwe Meyer (eds.): Geist und Moral. Analytische Reflexionen f\u00fcr Wolfgang Lenzen. Paderborn: mentis 2011. Pp. 177-196.<\/p>\n

A96<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: Three Types of Philosophical Theories. (\u201cTre tipi di teorie filosofiche\u201d, in Italian.) In: Richard Davies (ed.): Analisi. Annuario e Bollettino della Societ\u00e0 Italiana di Filosofia Analitica (SIFA) 2011. Milano; Udine: Mimesis 2011. Pp. 45-75.<\/p>\n

A97<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: Argument Schemes \u2013 An Epistemological Approach. In: Frank Zenker (ed.): Argumentation. Cognition and Community. Proceedings of the 9th<\/sup> International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA), May 18-22, 2011. Windsor, Canada: University of Windsor 2011. 32 pp. CD-ROM, ISBN 978-0-920233-66-5.<\/p>\n

A98<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: Subjunctive Tu quoque Arguments. Commentary on Anderson, Aikin & Casey. In: Frank Zenker (ed.): Argumentation. Cognition and Community. Proceedings of the 9th<\/sup> International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA), May 18-22, 2011. Windsor, Canada: University of Windsor 2011. 8 pp. CD-ROM, ISBN 978-0-920233-66-5. Web-publication, URL = <http:\/\/scholar.uwindsor.ca\/cgi\/viewcontent.cgi?article=1016&context=ossaarchive>.<\/p>\n

A99<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: Responsibility in Times of the Naturalised Mind \u2013 Is Ascriptive Responsibility Unfair? (Forthcoming in: Christoph Lumer (ed.): Morality in Times of Naturalising the Mind. Heusenstamm: Ontos 2012.)<\/p>\n

A100<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: Emotional Decisions. The Induction-of-Intrinsic-Desires Theory. In: Alessandro Innocenti; Angela Sirigu (eds.): Neuroscience and the Economics of Decision Making. Abingdon, UK; New York: Routledge 2012. Pp. 109-124.<\/p>\n

A101<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: Lumer, Christoph: The Epistemic Inferiority of Pragma-Dialectics \u2013 Reply to Botting. In: Informal Logic 32.1 (2012). Pp. 51-82.<\/p>\n

A102<\/i>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: Combining Intergenerational and International Justice.
\n1. Original version:<\/i> In: Intergenerational Justice Review 2012-1. Pp. 10-16.
\n2. German Translation:<\/i> Die Kombination von intergenerationeller und internationaler Gerechtigkeit. In: Journal f\u00fcr Generationengerechtigkeit 14.1 (2014). Pp. 18-26. \u2013 Additional web publications: URL: <http:\/\/www.ssoar.info\/ssoar\/bitstream\/handle\/document\/39419\/ssoar-jgen-2014-1-lumer-Die_Kombination_von_intergenerationeller_und.pdf?sequence=1<\/a>>, PID: <http:\/\/nbn-resolving.de\/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-394195<\/a>>.<\/p>\n

A103<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: The Volitive and the Executive Function of Intentions.
\n1. Full text:<\/em> In: Philosophical Studies 166,3 (2013). Pp. 511-527. (Online since 25 Nov. 2012.) URL: <http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007%2Fs11098-012-0048-8<\/a>>. DOI: 10.1007\/s11098-012-0048-8.<\/em>
\n2. Abbreviated version:<\/em> In: Akten des „XXII. Deutschen Kongresses f\u00fcr Philosophie“, 11-15 September 2011, M\u00fcnchen. Online publication 31.12.2011. 8 pp. URL: <http:\/\/epub.ub.uni-muenchen.de\/12609\/<\/a>>.<\/p>\n

A104\u2014<\/em>Lumer, Christoph:\u00a0Weakness of Will \u2013 A Systematisation and an Explanation. (\u201cWillensschw\u00e4che \u2013 Eine Systematisierung und eine Erkl\u00e4rung\u201d, in German.) In: Miguel Hoeltje; Thomas Spitzley; Wolfgang Spohn (eds.): Was d\u00fcrfen wir glauben? Was sollen wir tun? – Sektionsbeitr\u00e4ge des achten internationalen Kongresses der Gesellschaft f\u00fcr Analytische Philosophie e.V. [Konstanz, 17.-20.9.2012.] Online publication University Duisburg-Essen (DuEPublico) 2013. URL: <http:\/\/duepublico.uni-duisburg-essen.de\/servlets\/DocumentServlet?id=31200<\/a>>. Pp. 638-653.<\/p>\n

A105\u2014<\/em><\/i>Lumer, Christoph:\u00a0Morality in Times of Naturalising the Mind \u2013 An Overview. In: Christoph Lumer (ed.): Morality in Times of Naturalising the Mind. Boston; Berlin: de Gruyter 2014. Pp. 3-42.<\/p>\n

A106\u2014<\/i>Lumer, Christoph:\u00a0The Effectiveness of Intentions \u2013 A Critique of Wegner. In: Christoph Lumer (ed.): Morality in Times of Naturalising the Mind. Boston; Berlin: de Gruyter 2014. Pp. 105-124.<\/p>\n

A107<\/i>\u2014<\/i>Lumer, Christoph:\u00a0Practical Arguments for Prudential Justifications of Actions. In: Dima Mohammed; Marcin Lewi\u0144ski (eds.): Virtues of Argumentation. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA). Windsor, Ontario, May 22-26, 2013. Windsor, Canada: Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA) 2014. 16 pp. CD-rom, ISBN: 978-0-920233-66-5. Additional web publication, URL: <http:\/\/scholar.uwindsor.ca\/cgi\/viewcontent.cgi?article=2077&context=ossaarchive<\/a>>.<\/p>\n

A108\u2014<\/i>Lumer, Christoph:\u00a0Individualism in Welfare Ethics \u2013 Moral Problems of Utility Aggregation. („Individualismus in der Wohlfahrtsethik \u2013 Moralische Probleme der Nutzenaggregation“, in German.) In: Dietmar von der Pfordten; Lorenz K\u00e4hler (eds.): Normativer Individualismus in Ethik, Politik und Recht. T\u00fcbingen: Mohr Siebeck 2014. Pp. 31-68.<\/p>\n

A109<\/i>\u2014<\/i>Lumer, Christoph:\u00a0Person, Self, Ego \u2013 An Action Theoretical Approach. („Person, Selbst, Ich \u2013 ein handlungstheoretischer Ansatz“, in German.) In: XXIII. Kongress der Deutschen Gesellschaft f\u00fcr Philosophie. 28. September – 2. October 2014, M\u00fcnster. [Proceedings of the Conference.] 2014. 27 pp. Web publication: URN: urn:nbn:de:hbz:6-72319551665.\u00a0 URL: <http:\/\/nbn-resolving.de\/urn:nbn:de:hbz:6-72319551665<\/a>>.<\/p>\n

A110\u2014<\/em>Lumer, Christoph; Serkan Ince: Islamic Theological Arguments. An Epistemological Systematisation. In: Bart Garssen; David Godden; Gordon Mitchell; A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans (eds.): Proceedings of the 8th<\/sup> International Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation, Amsterdam, July 1-4, 2014. Amsterdam Sic Sat 2015. Pp. 896-906. CD-rom, ISBN: 978 90 361 0450 0. Web publication: URL: <http:\/\/rozenbergquarterly.com\/issa-proceedings-2014-islamic-theological-arguments-an-epistemological-systematisation\/<\/a>>.<\/p>\n

A111\u2014<\/em>Lumer, Christoph:\u00a0Walton\u2019s Argumentation Schemes.
\n2. Abridged version:<\/em> In: Patrick Bondy; Laura Benaquista (eds.): Argumentation, Objectivity, and Bias. Proceedings of the 11th<\/sup> International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA), 18-21 May 2016. Windsor, Canada: University of Windsor 2016. 20 pp. Online publication, URL: <http:\/\/scholar.uwindsor.ca\/cgi\/viewcontent.cgi?article=2286&context=ossaarchive<\/a>>, 19.12.2016.<\/p>\n

A112\u2014<\/em>Lumer, Christoph:\u00a0Commentary on \u201cOn Appeals to (Visual) Models\u201d: Appeals to Visual Models \u2013 An Epistemological Reconstruction of an Argument Type. In: Patrick Bondy; Laura Benaquista (eds.): Argumentation, Objectivity, and Bias. Proceedings of the 11th<\/sup> International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA), 18-21 May 2016. Windsor, Canada: University of Windsor 2016. 10 pp. Online publikation, URL: <http:\/\/scholar.uwindsor.ca\/cgi\/viewcontent.cgi?article=2347&context=ossaarchive<\/a>>, 19.12.2016.<\/p>\n

A113\u2014<\/em>Lumer, Christoph:\u00a0Automatic Actions \u2013 Agency, Intentionality, and Responsibility. In: Philosophical Psychology. 30, 5 (2017). Pp. 616-644. URL: <http:\/\/www.tandfonline.com\/doi\/full\/10.1080\/09515089.2017.1291928<\/a>>, 13.3.2017. DOI: 10.1080\/09515089.2017.1291928. Permanent link: http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1080\/09515089.2017.1291928.<\/p>\n

A114\u2014<\/em>Lumer, Christoph:\u00a0Ethical arguments for moral principles. In: Bart Garssen; David Godden; Gordon Mitchell; A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans (eds.): Proceedings of the 8th<\/sup> International Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation, Amsterdam, July 1-4, 2014. Amsterdam: Sic Sat 2015. 15 pp. Web-Publication: URL: <http:\/\/rozenbergquarterly.com\/issa-proceedings-2014-ethical-arguments-for-moral-principles\/<\/a>>. [Because of an error by the editors, unfortunately, this article appeared only in the proceedings\u2019 web version but not in the CD-rom version.]<\/p>\n

A115\u2014<\/em>Lumer, Christoph:\u00a0Attributive Responsibility \u2013 Sense, Specification, and Solution of the Deep Problem (\u201cResponsabilit\u00e0 attributiva \u2013 senso, precisazione e soluzione del problema profondo\u201d, in Italian). In: Francesco Miano (ed.): Etica e responsabilit\u00e0. Napoli; Salerno: Orthotes\u00a02018. Pp. 169-181.<\/p>\n

A116\u2014<\/em>Lumer, Christoph:\u00a0Strength of Justification \u2013 The Rational Degree of Certainty Approach. In: Steve Oswald; Didier Maillat (eds.): Argumentation and Inference. Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Argumentation, Fribourg 2017. London: College Publications 2018. Pp. 315-333.<\/p>\n

A117\u2014<\/em>Lumer, Christoph:\u00a0Unconscious Motives and Actions \u2013 Agency, Freedom and Responsibility. In: Frontiers in Psychology 9 (2019). 16 pp. Web-publication: URL: <https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/10.3389\/fpsyg.2018.02777\/full<\/a>>. DOI: 10.3389\/fpsyg.2018.02777.<\/p>\n

A118\u2014<\/em>Lumer, Christoph:\u00a0Freedom of the Will \u2013 From Theoretical to Practical Philosophy. A Dialogue with Sandro Nannini. („Libert\u00e0 del volere \u2013 dalla filosofia teoretica alla filosofia pratica. Un dialogo con Sandro Nannini“, in Italian.) In: Christoph Lumer; Giacomo Romano (eds.): Dalla filosofia dell\u2019azione alla filosofia della mente. Riflessioni in onore di Sandro Nannini. Messina: corisco 2018. Pp. 53-84. Open access: <http:\/\/www.coriscoedizioni.it\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/03\/dalla-filosofia-dellazione-alla-filosofia-della-mente.pdf<\/a>>.<\/p>\n

A119<\/em>\u2014<\/em>Lumer, Christoph:\u00a0Recognizing Argument Types and Adding Missing Reasons. In: Bart J. Garssen; David Godden; Gordon Mitchell; Jean H.M. Wagemans (eds.): Proceedings of the Ninth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (ISSA). [Amsterdam, July 3-6, 2018.] Amsterdam: Sic Sat 2019. Pp. 769-777. Web publication, URL = <http:\/\/cf.hum.uva.nl\/issa\/ISSA_2018_proceedings.pdf<\/a>>, 5.4.19.<\/p>\n

A120<\/em>\u2014<\/em>Lumer, Christoph:\u00a0Arguments from Expert Opinion \u2013 An Epistemological Approach. In: Catarina Dutilh Novaes; Henrike Jansen; Jan Albert van Laar; Bart Verheij (eds.): Reason to Dissent. Proceedings of the 3rd<\/sup> European Conference on Argumentation [Groningen 2019]. Vol. 1. [No place of publication given]: College Publications 2020: 403-422.<\/p>\n

A121<\/em>\u2014<\/em>Lumer, Christoph:\u00a0Knowledge and the epistemic function of argumentation \u2013 Comment on Gasc\u00f3n’s „Where are dissent and reasons in epistemic justification?“ In: Catarina Dutilh Novaes; Henrike Jansen; Jan Albert van Laar; Bart Verheij (eds.): Reason to Dissent. Proceedings of the 3rd<\/sup> European Conference on Argumentation [Groningen 2019]. Vol. 1. [No place of publication given]: College Publications 2020: 219-224.<\/p>\n

A122\u2014<\/em>Lumer, Christoph:\u00a0A <\/em>Theory of Philosophical Arguments. In: OSSA, Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (Ed.): Evidence, Persuasion & Diversity. Proceedings of Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation Conference, Vol. 12 (2020). Web publication 2020. 36 pp. URL: <https:\/\/scholar.uwindsor.ca\/cgi\/viewcontent.cgi?article=2487&context=ossaarchive<\/a>>.<\/p>\n

A123\u2014<\/em>Lumer, Christoph:\u00a0Automated Argument Analysis \u2013 Comment on: Mizrahi & Dickinson: „Argumentation in Philosophical Practice: An Empirical Study“. In: OSSA, Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (Ed.): Evidence, Persuasion & Diversity. Proceedings of Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation Conference, Vol. 12 (2020). Web publication 2020. 11 pp. URL: <https:\/\/scholar.uwindsor.ca\/cgi\/viewcontent.cgi?article=2597&context=ossaarchive<\/a>>.<\/p>\n

A124\u20141. Main text:<\/em> Lumer, Christoph:\u00a0Wie effizient sollen Altruisten handeln? [= How Efficiently Should Altruists Act?] In: Johannes L. Brandl; Beatrice S. Kobow; Daniel Messelken (eds.): Analytische Explikationen & Interventionen \/ Analytical Explications & Interventions. Ein Salzburger Symposium fu\u0308r und mit Georg Meggle. Paderborn: Brill-mentis 2021: 226-249.
\n2. Appendix:<\/em> Lumer, Christoph:\u00a0Berechnungen der moralischen Effizienz zweier wohlt\u00e4tiger Projekte \u2013 Kinderheim in Guatemala vs. Malariaprophylaxe. [= Calculations of the Moral Efficiency of Two Charitable Projects \u2013 Children’s Home in Guatemala vs. Malaria Prophylaxis.] Online publication 2021. 7 pp. URL: <http:\/\/www.lumer.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/A124.2_Lumer_WieEffizientSollenAltruistenHandeln_Anhang_BerechnungenDerMoralischenEffizienz.pdf<\/a>>.<\/p>\n

A125\u2014<\/em>Lumer, Christoph: Pr\u00e4ferenzen, Nutzen und ihre Aggregation. [= Preferences, Utilities, and Their Aggregation.] In: Christian Hiebaum (ed.): Handbuch „Gemeinwohl“. Wiesbaden: Springer VS 2022 (first online 13.4.2021): 177-193. URL: <https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-658-21086-1_12-1<\/a>>.<\/p>\n

A126\u2014<\/em>Lumer, Christoph:\u00a0Berechnungen der moralischen Effizienz. [= Calculations of moral Efficiency.] In: Johannes L. Brandl; Daniel Messelken; Sava Wedman (eds.): Denken. Reden. Handeln. \/ Thinking. Talking. Acting. Nachtr\u00e4ge zu einem Salzburger Symposium mit Georg Meggle. Salzburg: Open Access Publikationsserver der Universit\u00e4t Salzburg (ePLUS) 2021: 565-574. E-Book. URL = <https:\/\/eplus.uni-salzburg.at\/obvusboa\/download\/pdf\/6202655?originalFilename=true<\/a>>.<\/p>\n

A127\u2014<\/em>Lumer, Christoph: From Utilitarianism to Prioritarianism \u2013 an Empathy-Based Internalist Foundation of Welfare Ethics. In: Michael Schefczyk; Christoph Schmidt-Petri (eds): Utility, Progress, Technology. Proceedings of the 15th Conference of the International Society for Utilitarian Studies. [ISUS, Karlsruhe 23.-26.7.2018.] Karlsruhe: KIT Scientific Publishing 2021: 139-151. URL: <https:\/\/www.ksp.kit.edu\/site\/books\/e\/10.5445\/KSP\/1000134479\/<\/a>>.<\/p>\n

A128\u2014<\/em>Lumer, Christoph: How to Define ‚Prioritarianism‘ and Distinguish It from (Moderate) Egalitarianism. In: Michael Schefczyk; Christoph Schmidt-Petri (Hg): Utility, Progress, Technology. Proceedings of the 15th Conference of the International Society for Utilitarian Studies. [ISUS, Karlsruhe 23.-26.7.2018.] Karlsruhe: KIT Scientific Publishing 2021: 153-166. URL: <https:\/\/www.ksp.kit.edu\/site\/books\/e\/10.5445\/KSP\/1000134479\/<\/a>>.<\/p>\n

A129\u2014<\/em>Lumer, Christoph: An Epistemological Appraisal of Walton’s Argument Schemes. In: Informal Logic 42.1 (2022): 203-290. URL = <https:\/\/informallogic.ca\/index.php\/informal_logic\/article\/view\/7224<\/a>>.<\/p>\n

A130\u2014<\/em>Lumer, Christoph: La funzione morale della democrazia deliberativa. [(Italian) = The moral function of deliberative democracy.] In: Giovanni Cogliandro; Giovanna Costanzo (Eds.): Etica e politica. Napoli; Salerno: Orthotes 2022: 185-199. (ISBN: 978-88-9314-340-0.)<\/p>\n

A131\u2014<\/em>Lumer, Christoph: Epistemic Norms for Public Political Arguments. In: Argumentation 38.1 (2024): 63-83. <https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10503-022-09590-6<\/a>>.(Published online: 23 February 2023.)<\/p>\n

A132\u2014<\/em>Zenker, Frank; Jan Albert van Laar; B. Cepollaro; A. G\u00e2\u0163\u0103; M. Hinton; C. G. King; B. Larson; M. Lewi\u0144ski; C. Lumer; S. Oswald; M. Pichlak; B. D. Scott; M. Urba\u0144ski; J. H. M. Wagemans: Norms of Public Argumentation and the Ideals of Correctness and Participation. In: Argumentation 38.1 (2024): 7-40. <https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10503-023-09598-6<\/a>>. (Published online 22 March 2023.)<\/p>\n

A133\u2014<\/em>Lumer, Christoph: Strikter Pazifismus oder Wahl der besten Alternative? [= Strict Pacifism or Choice of the Best Option?] In: Zeitschrift f\u00fcr philosophische Forschung 77.2 (2023): 210-216. <https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3196\/004433023837453632<\/a>>.<\/p>\n

A134\u2014<\/em>Lumer, Christoph: The Relevance of Skovoroda’s Ethical Principles. Skovoroda’s Discussion of Real Happiness. In: The Journal of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Series Philosophy: Philosophical Peripeteias (\u0412\u0456\u0441\u043d\u0438\u043a \u0425\u0430\u0440\u043a\u0456\u0432\u0441\u044c\u043a\u043e\u0433\u043e \u043d\u0430\u0446\u0456\u043e\u043d\u0430\u043b\u044c\u043d\u043e\u0433\u043e \u0443\u043d\u0456\u0432\u0435\u0440\u0441\u0438\u0442\u0435\u0442\u0443 \u0456\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0456 \u0412. \u041d. \u041a\u0430\u0440\u0430\u0437\u0456\u043d\u0430, \u0421\u0435\u0440\u0456\u044f \u0424\u0456\u043b\u043e\u0441\u043e\u0444\u0456\u044f: \u0424\u0456\u043b\u043e\u0441\u043e\u0444\u0441\u044c\u043a\u0456 \u043f\u0435\u0440\u0438\u043f\u0435\u0442\u0456\u0457) 67 (2022): 87-91. (https:\/\/doi.org\/10.26565\/2226-0994-2022-67-10<\/a>). URL = <https:\/\/periodicals.karazin.ua\/philosophy\/article\/view\/22160<\/a>>.<\/p>\n

A135\u2014<\/em>Lumer, Christoph: Justifying the Epistemological Theory of Argumentation. On Harvey Siegel\u2019s Approach. In: Informal Logic 43.4 (2023): 574-600. (DOI: https:\/\/doi.org\/10.22329\/il.v43i4.8473<\/a>.) URL = https:\/\/informallogic.ca\/index.php\/informal_logic\/article\/view\/8473<\/a>.<\/p>\n

A136\u2014<\/em>Lumer, Christoph: Rules for Epistemically Oriented Argumentative Dialogues. In: Ronny Boogaart; Bart Garssen; Henrike Jansen; Maarten van Leeuwen; Roosmaryn Pilgram; Alex Reuneker (eds.): Proceedings of the Tenth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation. [Leiden, 4-7 July 2023.] Amsterdam: Sic Sat 2024: 604-614. URL = https:\/\/scholarlypublications.universiteitleiden.nl\/access\/item%3A4107852\/view<\/a>.<\/p>\n

A137\u2014<\/em>Lumer, Christoph: Altruismus \u2013 Probleme und Fragestellungen in der philosophischen Debatte. [= Altruism \u2013 Problems and Issues in the Philosophical Debate.] In: Dagmar Kiesel; Thomas Smettan; Sebastian Schmidt (eds.): Altruismus. Interdisziplin\u00e4re Perspektiven. Berlin: Metzler 2024: 1-23.<\/p>\n

A138\u2014<\/em>Lumer, Christoph: How to describe arguments in fundamental criteria for good arguments? In: Fabio Paglieri; Alessandro Ansani; Marco Marini (eds.): The Cognitive Dimension of Social Argumentation. Proceedings of the 4th European Conference on Argumentation [Rome 2022]. London: College Publications 2025: Vol. 3, pp. 17-30.<\/p>\n

A139\u2014<\/em>Lumer, Christoph: Progresso morale \u2013 Criteri ed esempi. [= Moral progress \u2013 criteria and examples.] In: Fabrizia Abbate; Giuseppe Pintus (eds.): Il progresso morale. Sfide, opportunit\u00e0 e prospettive future. Roma: Inschibboleth 2025: 469-494. URL = <https:\/\/www.inschibbolethedizioni.com\/acta-moralia-1\/il-progresso-morale<\/a>>.<\/p>\n

A140\u2014<\/em>\u041b\u0443\u043c\u0435\u0440, \u041a\u0440\u0456\u0441\u0442\u043e\u0444: \u0415\u043f\u0456\u0441\u0442\u0435\u043c\u043e\u043b\u043e\u0433\u0456\u0447\u043d\u0430 \u0442\u0435\u043e\u0440\u0456\u044f \u0430\u0440\u0433\u0443\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0442\u0430\u0446\u0456\u0457 \u0443 \u043a\u043e\u043d\u0442\u0435\u043a\u0441\u0442\u0456.[\u201cThe Epistemological Theory of Argumenrtation in Context\u201d, in Ukrainian.] In: \u041b\u0443\u043c\u0435\u0440, \u041a\u0440\u0456\u0441\u0442\u043e\u0444; \u0421\u0435\u0440\u0433\u0456\u0439 \u0421\u0435\u043a\u0443\u043d\u0434\u0430\u043d\u0442 (eds.): \u0422\u0435\u043e\u0440\u0456\u044f \u0410\u0440\u0433\u0443\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0442\u0430\u0446\u0456\u0457. \u0415\u043f\u0456\u0441\u0442\u0435\u043c\u043e\u043b\u043e\u0433\u0456\u0447\u043d\u0438\u0439 \u041f\u0456\u0434\u0445\u0456\u0434 (\u0410\u043d\u0442\u043e\u043b\u043e\u0433\u0456\u044f). Vol. 1: \u041a\u0440\u0438\u0442\u0438\u0447\u043d\u0435 \u043c\u0438\u0441\u043b\u0435\u043d\u043d\u044f \u0442\u0430 \u0435\u043f\u0456\u0441\u0442\u0435\u043c\u043e\u043b\u043e\u0433\u0456\u0447\u043d\u0438\u0439 \u043f\u0456\u0434\u0445\u0456\u0434 \u0434\u043e \u0430\u0440\u0433\u0443\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0442\u0430\u0446\u0456\u0457. \u041e\u0434\u0435\u0441\u0430: \u041d\u0430\u0437\u0430\u0440\u0447\u0443\u043a \u0421.\u041b. 2025: 14-62. [Christoph Lumer; Sergii Sekundant (eds.): Theory of Argumentation. The Epistemological Approach. (Anthology.) Vol. 1: Critical Thinking and the Epistemological Approach to Argumentation. Odessa: Nazarchuk S.L. 2025: 14-62.)] (ISBN: 978-617-7883-42-4.)<\/p>\n

A141\u2014<\/em>Lumer, Christoph: Moral Progress \u2013 Criteria and Examples. In: Actual Problems of Mind 27 (2025): 131-191. Open Access: https:\/\/journal.kdpu.edu.ua\/apd\/en\/article\/view\/7771\/7916<\/a>. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.31812\/apm27.asyt5h77<\/a>. ISSN 2522-4786 (Online), ISSN 2076-7382 (Print).<\/p>\n

A142\u2014<\/em>Lumer, Christoph: Normen-, Institutionen-, Motivutilitarismus. [(German) = \u201cNorm, institution, and motive utilitarianism\u201d.] In: Vuko Andri\u0107; Bernward Gesang (eds.): Handbuch Utilitarismus. Berlin: Metzler (Springer) 2025 (E-Version); 2026 (Print): 203-216.<\/p>\n

A143\u2014<\/em>Lumer, Christoph: Aggregierung und Maximierung. [(German) = \u201cAggregating and maximising\u201d.] In: Vuko Andri\u0107; Bernward Gesang (eds.): Handbuch Utilitarismus. Berlin: Metzler (Springer) 2025 (E-Version); 2026 (print): 67-78.<\/p>\n

A144\u2014<\/em>Lumer, Christoph: Prioritarismus und Egalitarismus. [(German) = \u201cPrioritarianism and egalitarianism\u201d.] In: Vuko Andri\u0107; Bernward Gesang (eds.): Handbuch Utilitarismus. Berlin: Metzler (Springer) 2025 (E-Version); 2026 (print): 577-589.<\/p>\n

A145\u2014<\/em>Lumer, Christoph: The Epistemic \/ Epistemological Theory of Argument. In: Scott Aikin; John Casey; Katharina Stevens (eds.): The Routledge Handbook of Argumentation Theory. New York; London: Routledge 2026: 43-53.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

IV.\u00a0Other works<\/strong><\/p>\n

C1<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: General Theory of Technology – The Instrumental and Political Dimension of Technology. („Allgemeine Techniktheorie – Die instrumentelle und politische Dimension der Technik“, in German.) Ms., chapter of my master’s thesis 1981. 34 pp.<\/p>\n

C2<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: Application to the German Research Fund (DFG) for a research project: How Good is Life? A Prudentialist Desirability Theory and its Application to Selected Life Situations. („Wie gut ist das Leben? Eine prudentielle W\u00fcnschbarkeitstheorie und ihre Anwendung auf ausgew\u00e4hlte Lebenssituationen“, in German.) 29 pp.<\/p>\n

C3<\/em>\u2014Kanzian, Christian; Christoph Lumer; Gerhard Schurz; Sven Walter: GAP.6. The congress of the „Society for Analytic Philosophy“. GAP.6. („\u00dcber den Kongress der „Gesellschaft f\u00fcr Analytische Philosophie““, in German.) In: Information Philosophie 5.2006. pp. 117-122.<\/p>\n

C4<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: Our Moral Responsibility Regarding Climate Change. (\u201cUnsere moralische Verantwortung in Sachen Klimawandel\u201c, in German.) Lecture given in Banja Luka on 11 October 2010 for Goethe-Institut Sarajewo.
\n1. German version:<\/em> Internet publication: <http:\/\/www.goethe.de\/mmo\/priv\/7096494-STANDARD.pdf<\/a>>, 17.2.2011. Ms. 2010.\u00a0 14 pp.
\n2. Serbo-Croat-Bosnian Translation:<\/em> Na\u0161a moralna odgovornost za klimatske promjene. Internet Publication: <http:\/\/www.goethe.de\/mmo\/priv\/7096492-STANDARD.pdf<\/a>>, 17.2.2011. Ms. 2010.\u00a0 13 pp.<\/p>\n

C5<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph; Uwe Meyer: Preface. (\u201eVorwort\u201c, in German) [Eulogy on Wolfgang Lenzen.] In: Christoph Lumer; Uwe Meyer (eds.): Geist und Moral. Analytische Reflexionen f\u00fcr Wolfgang Lenzen. Paderborn: mentis 2011. Pp. 7-14.<\/p>\n

C6<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: Moral Argumentation without Morals and Democracy without Demos? Comment on: Gregor Betz: Moralisches Argumentieren, praktische Gr\u00fcnde und deliberative Demokratie. (\u201cMoralisches Argumentieren ohne Moral und Demokratie ohne Demos? \u2013 Kommentar zu: Gregor Betz: Moralisches Argumentieren, praktische Gr\u00fcnde und deliberative Demokratie\u201d, in German) In: Information Philosophie 2018.2. Pp. 42-43.<\/p>\n

C7<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: Reviews in Philosophy. In: Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 21,2 (2018). Pp 203-205. DOI: 10.1007\/s10677-018-9891-9. Web version: <http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s10677-018-9891-9<\/a>>.<\/p>\n

C8<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph; Giacomo Romano: Preface. („Prefazione“, in Italian.) In: Christoph Lumer; Giacomo Romano (eds.): Dalla filosofia dell\u2019azione alla filosofia della mente \u2013 Riflessioni in onore di Sandro Nannini. Messina: corisco 2018. Pp. 7-11.<\/p>\n

C9<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: The Moral Function of Deliberative Democracy. Recording of a lecture for the (virtual) ECAP10-Congress, Utrecht, 24.-28.8.2020. 23 minutes.<\/p>\n

C10<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: Good methods in practical philosophy: idealising hermeneutics and technical constructivism. („Gute Methoden in der Praktischen Philosophie: idealisierende Hermeneutik und technischer Konstruktivismus“, in German.) Contribution to the blog „Pr\u00e4faktisch“, 18.3.2021. URL = <https:\/\/www.praefaktisch.de\/methoden-der-praktischen-philosophie\/zwei-gute-methoden-der-praktischen-philosophie-idealisierende-hermeneutik-und-technischer-konstruktivismus\/<\/a>>.<\/p>\n

C11<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: The Task of Politics within Morals. Talk given at: The 1st meeting of the Council for Ethics in Politics (online via Zoom), 28th July 2022, of the Global Council for Political Renewal. URL = <https:\/\/www.gcpr.global\/registration-ethics-in-politics<\/a>>.<\/p>\n

C12<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph: The Relevance of Skovoroda’s Ethical Principles. Skovoroda’s Discussion of Real Happiness. Gru\u00dfadresse bei den: \u0425\u0425\u0425 Kharkiv Iternational Skovoroda\u2019s Readings \u201cHryhoriy Skovoroda, a traveler in three worlds: Skovoroda’s work in the context of World Philosophy\u201d. To the 300th anniversary of his birth. Kharkiv, 9th October 2022. Presentation: URL = <https:\/\/drive.google.com\/drive\/folders\/1qh5WNH18jufdw80z_GIi_tSeuedCYbkM<\/a>> (1:14:56-1:39:00).<\/p>\n

C13<\/em>\u2014Zenker, Frank; Jan Albert van Laar; P. Abreu; M. Bengtsson; D. Castro; M. Cooke; I. Danka; B. De Cock; C. Dutilh Novaes; L. Farine; A. G\u00e2\u0163\u01ce; S. Greco; D. Grossi; T. Joli\u0107; D. Lanius; M. Lewi\u0144ski; C. Lumer; D. Mohammed; S. Oswald; M. Pichlak; E. H. Rast; J. Ritola; J. Rodriguez-Alc\u00e1zar; K. Sadek; B. D. Scott; I Stojanovic; C. W. Tindale; M. Urbanski; J. H. M. Wagemans: Goals and functions of public argumentation. (Unpublished working paper Cost Action APPLY: European Network for Argumentation and Public Policy Analysis.) 2019. URL = <https:\/\/run.unl.pt\/bitstream\/10362\/119876\/1\/WG2_Position_Paper_1_Goals_and_functions_of_public_argumentation_draft_1.pdf<\/a>>.<\/p>\n

C14<\/em>\u2014Lumer, Christoph; Nicoletta Ghigi; et al.: A theory of retrospective responsibility as part of the system of social and moral action control. Application Research Project of National Interest (2022) (to the Italian Ministery of University and Research) by the consortium Siena, Perugia (scientific part). [Financed.] Siena: University of Siena 2022. 17 pp. URL = <http:\/\/www.lumer.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/C014_Lumeral_ATheoryOfRetrospectiveResponsibility_PRIN2022-Application.pdf<\/a>>.<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Publications and Works by Christoph Lumer (Last update: 4.3.2026) Download List of Publications as pdf: Lumer_Publications_200707.pdf. I. (Monographic) Books B1\u2014Lumer, Christoph: Practical Theory of Argumentation. Theoretical Foundations, Practical Justification and Rules of Some Important Types of Arguments. („Praktische Argumentationstheorie. Theoretische … Weiterlesen →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":3,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.lumer.info\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/19"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.lumer.info\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.lumer.info\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.lumer.info\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.lumer.info\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=19"}],"version-history":[{"count":133,"href":"http:\/\/www.lumer.info\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/19\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2703,"href":"http:\/\/www.lumer.info\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/19\/revisions\/2703"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.lumer.info\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=19"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}